Transporter Room 3: The Star Trek Podcast

Beam in to TR3 for fun, incisive, and sometimes deep (space nine) conversations about all things Star Trek -- from the Original Series to the movies, Discovery, Picard, Lower Decks, Strange New Worlds... and beyond!

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Episode 76: Star Trek: Voyager: Why You Need to Watch "Relativity"

After a wee bout of temporal aphasia, Transporter Room 3 is back -- and this time, we bring gifts!

Transporter Room 3, Episode 76

Subscribe:

This week, we announce the winner of Diamond Select's very cool USS Excelsior. Listen to find out if you won, but here’s a hint: Your favorite ship is a tie between the Enterprise-A and the Defiant!

sevens

And Star Trek loves time travel, and Voyager's Season 5 episode "Relativity" is one of Trek's most entertaining trips through time ever. It's got Seven, a dry-docked Voyager and (literal) time bombs. Why is this episode so good? Listen and found out.

"Relativity" also gives us our Red Shirt of the Week -- who suffers from a case of one too many quantum leaps.

Relativity

So put on your Star-Lord headphones, watch out for temporal psychosis and listen to the latest episode of TR3!

Please subscribe (click the icon) to get all the latest episodes of our podcast automatically. Friend us on Facebook, star-rate us on iTunes, and e-mail us at Transporter Room 3 at Gmail dot com. Also, stalk us on Twitter:

Scott Collura: twitter.com/ScottIGN


Listen to Episode 76 of Transporter Room 3 right here:

Transporter Room 3, Episode 76

Subscribe:

2 comments:

  1. One of the best episodes/two-parters of Voyager is of course Year of Hell. A lot of people, including myself, think that this was what Voyager should have been like (or at least a season). No repairs, failing power, etc. I also think the writers knew this in hindsight and that is where the Xindi arc from Enterprise came from. What do you guys think?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh yeah -- that is what Voyager should have been! Never thought of the Xindi connection, but could be so...

    ReplyDelete